Kingdom Code of Conduct
A Code of Conduct for Truth, Accountability, and Restoration
By Andrew Kingdom | Version 1.0 | 2026-07-12 | Public Draft
License
This document is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Intent: This Code is offered freely for use, inspiration, and adaptation in principle. However, I do not permit alterations to this specific document or its text while representing it as my work. If you wish to modify it, please write your own Code of Conduct from scratch, crediting this work as a source. If you believe there is a significant problem with this Code, please contact me directly rather than creating a derivative version.
© 2026 Andrew Kingdom
1. Why we have this
We want this to be a place where people are honest, fair, and genuinely care about one another.
This is not just about catching rule-breakers. It is about building a community where you can grow, make mistakes, learn from them, and still be fully part of the team.
We believe:
- Truth matters – we do not deliberately mislead each other.
- People matter – every person has inherent dignity and is not worthless. This does not mean everyone is identical in standing or trust—those are earned through choices and actions—but it does mean no one is beneath basic respect or fair treatment.
- Second chances matter – we give people room to change.
- Fairness matters – the rules apply to every person equally. However, because leaders have greater power and influence, they face greater expectations and stricter consequences when they fail.
This document sets out how we treat each other, what we will not tolerate, how to raise concerns, and what happens if someone breaks these standards.
2. Who this applies to
Everyone. Employees, contractors, board members, volunteers, visitors—anyone involved with us. In person, by email, on messaging platforms, on video calls, or anywhere else we interact.
The more authority you have, the more accountable you are. Leaders are not exempt.
3. How we treat each other
We expect everyone here to do these things:
3.1 Be truthful – and distinguish honest error from wilful deception
- Say what you know to be true. Do not knowingly misrepresent facts or hide information that matters.
- If you do not know something, say so.
- If you make an honest mistake, correct it promptly. Honest errors are not violations of this Code.
- What is a violation is deliberately misleading someone, setting them up to fail, or knowingly creating a false impression. The key is intent to deceive.
3.2 Judge ideas by their substance, not their age
- Do not dismiss an idea just because it is old. That is lazy thinking.
- Do not embrace an idea just because it is new. That is also lazy thinking.
- Ask: Does it work? Does it help people? Is there real evidence for it?
- If you propose change, show why the new way is better. If you defend the current way, show why it still holds up.
3.3 Base decisions on evidence, not feelings or pressure
- Do not rely on gossip, hunches, or group pressure for serious decisions.
- For important matters, get more than one source of information.
- Act on the best evidence available, but stay open to new information that might change your mind.
3.4 Speak directly and respectfully
- If you have a concern about someone, raise it with them first, not with everyone else.
- Give difficult feedback in person or on a call, with the aim of helping them improve.
- Do not gossip. Do not undermine others indirectly. If you would not say it to their face, do not say it at all.
3.5 Serve the mission, not your ego
- See your role as a way to contribute to the team, not to boost your own status.
- Do not lobby for recognition or honours. Let your work speak for itself. Let others be promoted ahead of you if that serves the community.
- Put the group's good ahead of your personal visibility.
- Use resources responsibly. Do not game the system for your own benefit.
3.6 Take ownership
- Own your actions and their consequences.
- If you get something wrong, admit it and help put it right.
- Hold others to the same standards you apply to yourself—and accept accountability from them without defensiveness.
- We respect each person's freedom to choose—but choices have consequences. Honest choices build trust; dishonest choices erode it. This is not a judgment on a person's ultimate worth; it is a practical reality of living and working together.
3.7 Be patient and supportive
- Give people a fair chance to learn new skills or adapt to change.
- When someone struggles, offer help and clear guidance before assuming they do not care.
- Do not judge someone's entire character by a single mistake. Distinguish the action from the person.
- Once someone has genuinely addressed a problem, treat the matter as closed. Do not keep bringing it up in future evaluations.
3.8 Look out for one another
- Speak well of colleagues when they are not present—especially if others are criticising them unfairly.
- If you hear someone being misrepresented, correct the record if you can.
- Before assuming bad intent, consider whether stress, confusion, or lack of information might explain their behaviour.
- Offer help before people have to ask—especially to newcomers or those in difficult situations.
- When giving feedback, choose your tone and timing to build the other person up, not to humiliate them.
3.9 Respect everyone's dignity
- Treat every person as having basic dignity that is not earned. They are not disposable and they are not mere tools. This dignity is not conditional on performance.
- However, a person's standing, trust, and influence in this community are affected by their choices and actions—just as accountability and consequences are also shaped by those same choices. Basic respect belongs to everyone; earned trust belongs to those who demonstrate reliability, honesty, and goodwill.
- Respect cultural differences in style and etiquette, but never let culture excuse abuse, dishonesty, or exclusion. Be patient with people going through loss or hardship, while still expecting honesty and fairness from them.
3.10 Go to someone you have wronged
- If you learn that someone is upset with you because of something you did, go to them and talk about it. Do not wait for them to come to you.
- If you have wronged someone—even by accident—apologise and ask what you can do to make it right.
- It is your job to seek reconciliation, not just the other person's.
3.11 Check yourself before raising a concern
- Before you raise a serious complaint about someone else, take an honest look at your own behaviour.
- Are you ignoring a similar problem in yourself?
- Do not use this Code to attack someone you do not like, or to distract from your own shortcomings.
- Raise concerns only to protect and restore, not to win arguments or settle personal scores.
- Important: This self-examination is for your own integrity. It is not a requirement before you can report, and it will not be used to delay or dismiss your concern.
3.12 Your own decision what to report
- Personal wrongs—things done against you that do not seriously harm others—are yours to handle as you see fit.
- You may choose to let them go and forgive the person. That is a good and honourable choice. You may also choose to raise a concern if the matter is serious enough that you cannot let it go, or if you believe it affects others. That is also your choice.
- No one else gets to tell you that something done to you is "not a big deal" or pressure you not to raise it. That decision is yours alone.
- Choosing not to report does not mean you are expected to tolerate ongoing harm. If the behaviour continues, you are always free to report it later. And no one is allowed to pressure you to remain silent—that itself would be a breach of this Code.
- The community will take every reported concern seriously. If the matter is truly a personal offence between individuals, we will treat it as such. If it involves harm to others or abuse of power, we will act to protect the community.
4. What we do not tolerate
These are hard lines. Do not cross them.
4.1 Wilful deception
- Knowingly making false statements, fabricating data, or suppressing material facts.
- Pressuring others to lie or cover things up.
- Setting someone up to fail by withholding information they need.
4.2 Gaming the system
- Distorting metrics or performance indicators to present a false picture.
- Building systems that silently pressure people to cut corners.
4.3 Retaliation against people who speak up
- Targeting, threatening, or sidelining anyone who raises a genuine concern.
- Creating an atmosphere where people are afraid to speak the truth.
4.4 Abusing authority
- Using rank to bully, intimidate, or exploit others.
- Taking credit for others' work or blaming subordinates to protect yourself.
- Demanding loyalty that overrides truth, fairness, or the well-being of others.
4.5 Gossip and indirect attacks
- Spreading negative information about others without first addressing it with them directly.
- Undermining people's work or reputation through indirect means.
- Using silence, ambiguity, or withdrawal as a weapon to punish or control.
4.6 Harassment, discrimination, or exploitation
- Any form of bullying, threats, or psychological abuse.
- Treating people unfairly because of race, gender, age, beliefs, or background.
- Taking advantage of someone's vulnerability or trust for personal gain.
4.7 Refusing to engage with reality
- Ignoring clear, documented evidence that contradicts your position.
- Refusing to participate in accountability processes in good faith.
- Repeatedly dismissing feedback without a valid reason.
- Important: Struggling to meet expectations while honestly trying and accepting feedback is NOT prohibited. What IS prohibited is refusing to try, ignoring feedback, or repeating the same harmful behaviour without genuine effort to change.
4.8 Bias against age—old or new
- Rejecting something only because it is old, without examining its substance.
- Rejecting something only because it is new, without examining its substance.
- Insisting on tradition without reason, or insisting on change without reason. Both are intellectual laziness.
- Serious arguments must be based on evidence, logic, and real impact on people.
4.9 Holding a resolved mistake against someone
- Once someone has genuinely acknowledged their error, made amends, and shown changed behaviour, the matter is closed.
- Continuing to punish them indefinitely is unjust and is itself a breach of this Code.
5. What to do if something goes wrong
5.1 Raise it
- If you reasonably believe someone has broken this Code, report it through our designated channels.
- Include details: what happened, who was involved, when, and any evidence or witnesses.
- You may report anonymously, but we will only act if there is enough evidence to proceed.
5.2 How we investigate
- We will look into it fairly, thoroughly, and with appropriate confidentiality.
- For serious matters, we will seek multiple sources and weigh the evidence carefully.
- The person accused will be told the allegations and given a fair chance to respond, provide evidence, and call witnesses.
- We will not take action based on an accusation alone. We need real evidence.
5.3 Protection for good-faith reporters
- If you raise a genuine concern in good faith, we will protect you from retaliation—even if your concern turns out not to be upheld.
- Retaliation against a good-faith reporter is itself a serious breach.
5.4 False accusations
- If you knowingly make a false or malicious accusation, that is also a breach, and you will face consequences.
6. What happens if you break the rules
We start with the lightest response and escalate only when we have to. Our aim is to restore, not to punish. Even with repeated failures, we look for signs of genuine effort and change. Separation is a last resort, used only when ongoing harm makes it impossible to remain together.
The steps we take
- An informal conversation – A private, low-key discussion to make you aware and find a solution. No formal record.
- A written warning – A formal note stating what went wrong, what needs to change, by when, and what support is available.
- Mediation – A facilitated process where both sides talk things through, repair what is broken, and agree on a way forward.
- Suspension or demotion – A temporary or permanent reduction in responsibilities, with clear conditions for regaining full standing.
- Departure from the organisation – Only when all other steps have failed, or when the harm is so serious that continued association is impossible. This is always a last resort.
What determines the outcome
- The seriousness of the breach, the harm caused, and your willingness to change.
- Our core principles—honesty, fairness, accountability, and goodwill—are fixed and non-negotiable.
- But how we apply them depends on the situation. Treating every case identically regardless of context is not fairness; it is rigidity.
- All decisions are based on the best available evidence and are open to appeal.
- If you genuinely admit your mistake, fix it, and demonstrate changed behaviour over time, we will treat you as fully restored. We will not hold your past against you in future opportunities or evaluations.
- However, if you repeatedly ignore clear evidence or commit the same breach again after correction, that will be treated more seriously. That is not a lack of goodwill; it is recognising that goodwill requires a genuine response.
- How you treat others—especially when they are in trouble—sets a precedent. If you are harsh and quick to condemn, you should expect others to treat you the same way when you fail. If you are patient and forgiving, you are more likely to receive patience in return. This is not a game; it is how human communities actually work.
Leaders are held to a higher standard
- If you hold a leadership position, the standard is higher, not lower.
- Breaches that involve abusing authority, suppressing truth, or creating systemic pressure will be treated more severely.
- No one is exempt—not founders, not executives, not board members.
7. What if you think we got it wrong?
7.1 You can appeal
- Anyone subject to a decision under this Code may appeal.
- The appeal will be heard by someone not involved in the original decision.
- Grounds for appeal: procedural error, new evidence, or disproportionate consequence.
7.2 We review this document regularly
- We will update this Code as needed, with transparency and notice to everyone.
- But no update will ever abandon the core principles: honesty, fairness, accountability, and practical goodwill.
8. What this is really about
This Code is not a random list. It is built on principles that have been tested over time—things that any reasonable person, anywhere, would recognise as fair. This section explains the thinking behind it.
8.1 We deal with the real world
- Reality exists. Facts are not optional.
- But we are not omniscient. We can be wrong, and our knowledge is always incomplete. So we act on the best evidence available, we test our conclusions, and we stay open to correction.
- We distinguish between having enough evidence to act and claiming perfect knowledge. We need the first; we do not claim the second.
8.2 Authority is responsibility, not privilege
- Being in charge means serving others, not yourself.
- The more power you have, the more duty you have to use it well.
- That is why leaders are held to a higher standard, not a lower one.
8.3 Age does not prove or disprove anything
- An idea is not false because it is old.
- An idea is not true because it is old.
- An idea is not true because it is new.
- An idea is not false because it is new.
- We judge ideas by their actual results, their fit with reality, and their effect on people. We require evidence, not just tradition or fashion.
8.4 Our first goal is restoration, not punishment
- When someone makes a mistake, our first aim is to help them correct it, learn from it, and return to full contribution.
- Punishment is a last resort, used only when repeated correction has failed or when harm is so severe that safety requires separation.
- This is not sentimentality. It is the recognition that people can change, and that a community which does not allow change eventually destroys itself.
8.5 Goodwill is the atmosphere we cultivate
- We define goodwill practically: assume positive intent until proven otherwise; defend others when they are not present; offer help before it is demanded; give feedback that builds up rather than tears down.
- This is not a vague ideal. It is a set of specific behaviours listed in Sections 3.7 and 3.8, and we expect it from everyone.
- A community without goodwill is a machine. A community with goodwill is a place where people can truly flourish.
8.6 We respect cultures without abandoning standards
- We respect differences in how people greet, communicate, and express themselves.
- But no culture can be used to excuse abuse, discrimination, dishonesty, or exploitation.
- Every person has inherent worth. That is non-negotiable.
- This Code is a human instrument, not a sacred text. Good people wrote it, and good people will apply it.
- We will review and update it as needed. But no update will abandon its core principles: honesty, fairness, accountability, and practical goodwill.
8.8 We try to resolve things directly and personally—but not when it is unsafe
- For personal disputes or misunderstandings, we try to resolve them directly by talking first.
- However, if you are facing serious harm, abuse, or exploitation, you do not have to confront the person directly. You can go straight to reporting channels. We will never require you to put yourself at risk by talking to someone who has harmed you.
- If you have caused a problem, go to the person affected. If you have a personal grievance, forgive it if you can, or report it if you cannot.
- Formal processes exist for serious cases. The ordinary pattern of this community is direct, honest conversation—but never at the expense of safety.
8.9 We pay special attention to those who are vulnerable
- Our commitment to dignity is practical, not theoretical. We notice and protect people who have less power, less status, or less voice.
- We make an extra effort to welcome newcomers and to support those who are struggling.
- This is not favouritism. It is recognising that power naturally flows to the already powerful, and we must consciously counter that.
8.10 How you treat others sets the tone for how you will be treated
- If you are quick to condemn others, you will be judged harshly by others. If you are patient, you will receive patience.
- This is not a bargaining tool. It is simply what happens in any community. The tone you set with others is the tone that will be set for you. We build the culture we choose to live in.
Final note
This Code does not promise comfort at the expense of truth, nor harmony at the expense of justice. It promises a community that deals with reality—where you are treated fairly, held to high standards, given genuine opportunities to grow, and supported when you make the effort to change.
If you persist in harming others and refuse to stop, you will face clear, proportionate consequences. But if you genuinely correct your course, you will be welcomed back as a full member of this community.
That is the agreement. It is clear. It is fair. And it works.
Appendix A: International Law Compliance (for organisational confidence)
This appendix is not part of the operative Code. It exists to provide confidence to legal, HR, and governance teams that the document does not conflict with core international human rights, labour, or privacy frameworks.
Why this Code does not breach international law
| International Law Principle |
How the Code Aligns |
| Non-discrimination (UDHR Art 2, ICCPR Art 26, ILO C111) |
Section 4.6 explicitly prohibits discrimination on race, gender, age, beliefs, or background |
| Freedom from harassment and abuse (UDHR Art 3, 5) |
Section 4.6 prohibits bullying, threats, psychological abuse, and exploitation |
| Freedom of association (ICCPR Art 22, ILO C87) |
Not restricted. The CoC governs conduct, not association rights |
| Right to privacy (ICCPR Art 17, GDPR) |
Section 5.2 requires confidentiality "appropriate to the circumstances" |
| Procedural fairness / due process (UDHR Art 10) |
Sections 5–7 establish fair investigation, right to respond, and right of appeal |
| Protection from retaliation (UNGP Principle 12) |
Sections 3.3, 4.3, and 5.3 explicitly protect good-faith reporters |
| Freedom of expression (ICCPR Art 19) |
Section 3.4 requires "direct and respectful" speech but does not prohibit lawful expression |
| Inherent human dignity (UDHR Art 1) |
The Preamble and Section 3.9 anchor the entire document in universal, unearned dignity |
Conclusion: The Code is voluntary and internal. It is not state law or legally binding regulation. It respects cultural diversity while maintaining universal standards (Sections 3.9, 8.6), which aligns with international law's framework of universal human rights with cultural sensitivity.
Version History
- v1.0 (2026-07-12) – Initial release. Grounded in objective truth, evidentiary standards, universal dignity, restorative justice, and the distinction between inherent dignity and earned standing.